In the current socio-cultural landscape, the establishment of new norms surrounding transgender identity has emerged as a contentious issue that demands thoughtful consideration and balanced discourse. As society grapples with evolving notions of gender and identity, it is imperative to approach this topic with a discerning eye. What is required is a perspective that seeks to address the problems associated with these shifting norms, while emphasizing the importance of maintaining traditional values and societal cohesion.

Redefining Gender: A Delicate Balance

The redefinition of gender, while a pivotal aspect of movements within contemporary society that are collectively termed ‘progressivism,’ has been met with scepticism from conservatives who view it as a departure from established societal norms. The traditional understanding of gender has historically been anchored in a binary framework, rooted in biology and cultural heritage. There are undoubtedly complexities that emerge when these established norms are challenged. While I acknowledge the importance of inclusivity and respect for individuals’ experiences, I would warn against undermining the significance of biological distinctions and the potential erosion of essential cultural foundations.

The Erosion of Language and Objective Truth

We should never underestimate the role of language in shaping societal values and norms. The advent of new language to describe transgender experiences has sparked debates about its potential impact on communication and understanding. As language evolves to reflect a spectrum of gender identities, there is concern that this shift may lead to confusion and miscommunication, potentially eroding the shared understanding necessary for effective dialogue. This concern is heightened by the tension between personal experiences and objective truths, as the traditional perspective underscores the importance of maintaining a connection to verifiable realities.

The Clash with Freedom of Expression

The traditional viewpoint, sometimes disparagingly referred to ‘conservative,’ or ‘standing in the way of progress,’ highlights the potential conflict between new transgender norms and freedom of expression. While advocating for respect and inclusivity, conservatives stress the need to protect the right to express differing opinions. The pressure to conform to new norms can inadvertently stifle open discussion and curtail the free exchange of ideas. There is an importance of striking a balance between fostering an environment of acceptance and preserving the liberty to voice concerns about the societal implications of redefined norms.

Implications for Children and Education

The introduction of transgender norms has significant implications for children and education. I have reservations about introducing complex gender concepts to young children, as I feel that such discussions may lead to confusion and anxiety. I would argue that comprehensive discussions about gender and identity should be age-appropriate and carefully considered to avoid unnecessary emotional turmoil during a crucial phase of cognitive development.

Medical and Ethical Considerations

The medical aspects of transgender identity also warrant careful examination. The growing trend of gender-affirming medical interventions has raised ethical questions regarding the capacity of minors to make life-altering decisions. The medical solutions offered to young people cannot be reversed. There is therefore a pressing need for parental involvement and comprehensive psychological assessment before any medical procedures are pursued, in order to safeguard against potential long-term consequences that could arise from impulsive decisions made during a period of emotional turmoil.

Maintaining Social Cohesion

Perhaps the most salient concern for me is the potential impact of shifting transgender norms on societal cohesion. Traditional values and institutions play a vital role in maintaining stability and a sense of unity within a society. The rapid transformation of norms can lead to a cultural dissonance that challenges the very foundation upon which societies are built. The traditional perspective acknowledges the need for sensitivity to individual experiences while advocating for a gradual approach that takes into account the potential consequences of abrupt changes to deeply ingrained societal norms.

Conclusion: A Call for Thoughtful Reflection

The challenges posed by the establishment of new norms surrounding transgender identity are complex and multifaceted. It is crucial to approach these changes with a balance between inclusivity and the preservation of foundational values. While embracing diversity and recognizing the rights of transgender individuals, ‘conservatives’ emphasize the importance of maintaining open discourse, protecting freedom of expression, and safeguarding the psychological and emotional well-being of all members of society.

In the midst of these transformations, the role of tradition should not be dismissed outright. Rather, tradition should be viewed as a repository of wisdom, informing our actions as we navigate the uncharted waters of evolving norms. By fostering a climate of respectful dialogue, where differing perspectives are considered and acknowledged, we can arrive at a nuanced understanding that respects individual experiences while maintaining the essential fabric of society. This approach invites us to engage in this conversation thoughtfully and empathetically, ensuring that the establishment of new transgender norms is a process rooted in careful consideration and genuine progress.

The Ancient Viewpoint: Quite Progressive

Although it’s the perspective of an ancient culture, and therefore of dubious value to a contemporary liberal thinker, the Vedic view on transgender is actually quite ‘progressive.’ All non-normative sexual orientations or cases of gender-dysmorphia were grouped under the social heading of ‘third-sex’ or Tritiya-prakriti. In the social stratification and diversity of the ancient world, this meant that there was no pressure to fit – like a square peg in a round hole – into one homogenous society. The Tritiya-prakriti had their own society within a society.

This has perpetuated, give or take some lingering British-Victorian social attitudes, into modern India. Transwomen – women who were born as men but never felt themselves to be men – are known as hijras and have their own distinct communities. In the national census of India in 2011, 49,000 were registered as ‘third-sex’ and in 2014 the Supreme Court of India reinstated this ancient notion of self-identity as a legal identity. On official documents in India such as passports, a person may thus be acknowledged as Male (M) Female (F) or Transgender (T). Yet modern Indian society still marginalises their third-sex, and a staggering 31% have attempted suicide or have other psychological difficulties.

The ancient Upanishadic view is that each soul is a quantum of consciousness and therefore entirely free from biological sex or gender. Rather as the breeze passes alternately over a perfumed rose bed then a dung-heap, picking up the aromas yet never being changed by them, the soul similarly picks up different conceptions as it passes through one life after another. One life a man, the next a woman, it is no wonder the soul sometimes has a lingering fragrance of the last life and becomes confused.


Leave a comment